<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>idkfa rss feed</title>
        <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3</link>
        <atom:link href="http://idkfa.com/v3/rss.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>idkfa: syndicated</description>
        <item>
           <title>Governator: I&#39;m impressed.  Now how do we get a hold</title>
           <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=1068&amp;msg_id=1088</link>
           <description>I&#39;m impressed.  Now how do we get a hold of the algorithm and start making a killing on the market.</description>
           <author>Governator@idkfa.com (Governator)</author>
           <category>Indiscernible from Magic</category>
           <pubDate>Thu, 21 Oct 2010 17:00:23 -0800</pubDate>
           <guid>http://idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=1068&amp;msg_id=1088</guid>
       </item>
            <item>
           <title>kaiden: That is sort of bizarre. I&#39;m surprised</title>
           <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=1068&amp;msg_id=1069</link>
           <description>That is sort of bizarre. I&#39;m surprised they found that high of a correlation.     Also interesting is that they were trying to gauge market trends by using &quot;emotional&quot; types of words (&ldquo;friendly,&rdquo; &ldquo;peeved,&rdquo; &ldquo;active,&rdquo; &ldquo;on edge&rdquo; and &ldquo;panicky&quot;). It&#39;d be interesting to see their data on how different factors affected overall emotions. Or maybe an overall study on how to predict people&#39;s emotions, and aggregate emotions on the Internet.</description>
           <author>kaiden@idkfa.com (kaiden)</author>
           <category>Indiscernible from Magic</category>
           <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:57:38 -0800</pubDate>
           <guid>http://idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=1068&amp;msg_id=1069</guid>
       </item>
            <item>
           <title>kitacek: Holy</title>
           <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=1068&amp;msg_id=1068</link>
           <description>Holy shit:   http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2010/10/twitter-crystal-ball/?utm_source=feedburner&amp;utm_medium=feed&amp;utm_campaign=Feed%3A+wired%2Findex+%28Wired%3A+Index+3+%28Top+Stories+2%29%29&amp;utm_content=Google+Feedfetcher     Researchers use Twitter to predict stock market trends three days in advance with +80% accuracy using archived tweets from 2008 and historical stock market data.</description>
           <author>kitacek@idkfa.com (kitacek)</author>
           <category>Indiscernible from Magic</category>
           <pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 16:01:21 -0800</pubDate>
           <guid>http://idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=1068&amp;msg_id=1068</guid>
       </item>
            
    </channel>
</rss> 
