<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no" ?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>idkfa rss feed</title>
        <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3</link>
        <atom:link href="http://idkfa.com/v3/rss.php" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <description>idkfa: syndicated</description>
        <item>
           <title>kaiden: SCROLL TO IT JOSH.       Well, that&#39;s</title>
           <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5047</link>
           <description>SCROLL TO IT JOSH.       Well, that&#39;s sort of a fun thing: I am. At least, I do the best job that I can, given the random content I&#39;m displaying.     There are two display mechanisms on idkfa:         &quot;Classic&quot; mode, the &quot;1995-style bullshit&quot; that displays one post at a time according to user selection, as well as that post&#39;s relative position in the thread.       &quot;Full&quot; mode, where all replies in a thread are rendered in full.       For classic mode, browser scrolling isn&#39;t an issue: you&#39;re only every displaying 1 thing, and that thing is at the top.     For full mode, this becomes a problem, as the contents of a post can change the geometry of the thread after a page has loaded. For instance: a thread full of dozens of hilarious, hand-picked GIFs that load slowly even over a broadband connection. Even though I can tell the browser &quot;Go to this inline bookmark called thread_NNNN,&quot; the browser can only do so accurately at the time that I ask it (meaning, I can tell it to focus anywhere on the page, but that point can change according to user action, dynamic changes to page elements, or late-loading page elements changing the geometry of the page). So, I do scroll for you, but it only works well when there are relatively few page geometry changes after the initial page load.     If you look at the thread display page&#39;s HTML source, you&#39;ll see the following code (with actual commentary):    &#10;    // Little hackish... but so is everything else.&#10;    Event.observe(&#10;        document, &#10;        &#39;dom:loaded&#39;, &#10;        function() { &#10;            if( window.location.href.indexOf( &#39;#thd_&#39; ) == -1 ) {&#10;                window.location = window.location + &#39;#thd_5043&#39;;&#10;            }&#10;        } &#10;    );     This script binds an event handler that triggers when the programmatic underpinnings of the rendered page are available for manipulation (the</description>
           <author>kaiden@idkfa.com (kaiden)</author>
           <category>idkfa</category>
           <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 12:15:29 -0800</pubDate>
           <guid>http://idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5047</guid>
       </item>
            <item>
           <title>conrad: Which is some 1995-style bullshit, right?</title>
           <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5046</link>
           <description>Which is some 1995-style bullshit, right? Where&#39;s my Web 5.0?!</description>
           <author>conrad@idkfa.com (conrad)</author>
           <category>idkfa</category>
           <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 11:23:46 -0800</pubDate>
           <guid>http://idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5046</guid>
       </item>
            <item>
           <title>Scrotor: Crockett is correct. He wins.     I ask this</title>
           <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5045</link>
           <description>Crockett is correct. He wins.     I ask this because I will click on what i hope is a hilarious GIF, and then other items load and make it move down the page so I have to scroll to it. SCROLL TO IT JOSH.</description>
           <author>Scrotor@idkfa.com (Scrotor)</author>
           <category>idkfa</category>
           <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 03:51:12 -0800</pubDate>
           <guid>http://idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5045</guid>
       </item>
            <item>
           <title>conrad: Methinks he probably means this thread.  All</title>
           <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5044</link>
           <description>Methinks he probably means this thread.  All the pinned images (that aren&#39;t special announcements, ala Sammich and Kitty), which appear in oldest-first order.     Where&#39;s my prize?!  I translated Erik-thought into English first this time!</description>
           <author>conrad@idkfa.com (conrad)</author>
           <category>idkfa</category>
           <pubDate>Thu, 04 Apr 2013 02:22:11 -0800</pubDate>
           <guid>http://idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5044</guid>
       </item>
            <item>
           <title>kaiden: What do you mean by &quot;when viewed</title>
           <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5043</link>
           <description>What do you mean by &quot;when viewed together?&quot;</description>
           <author>kaiden@idkfa.com (kaiden)</author>
           <category>idkfa</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:12:30 -0800</pubDate>
           <guid>http://idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5043</guid>
       </item>
            <item>
           <title>Scrotor: Why are the images you post to the front page,</title>
           <link>http://www.idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5042</link>
           <description>Why are the images you post to the front page, when viewed together, in oldest first sorting order?</description>
           <author>Scrotor@idkfa.com (Scrotor)</author>
           <category>idkfa</category>
           <pubDate>Wed, 03 Apr 2013 20:06:28 -0800</pubDate>
           <guid>http://idkfa.com/v3/v_thread.php?thread_id=5042&amp;msg_id=5042</guid>
       </item>
            
    </channel>
</rss> 
