"[B]y way of the causality that exists only in our perception."

You've already explained this to me a few times. This concept is still illogical to me, and made no better by bringing causality into it.

And maybe it's easy to draw a comparison to our folk-quantum-theory level knowledge, but what problems does Kant solve with quantum mechanics? I don't see value in choosing to perceive the value of a qubit more robustly. It's still just the result of a probability function.

#1359, posted at 2010-12-02 02:14:40 in Language; Literature; Writing